1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with the clients, three (3) out of three (3) did not corroborate the allegation. One of the clients interviewed stated that they are happy with the food served at the facility and do not have any concerns related to the food. Another client interviewed stated that they always receive meals and snacks when they request food and that they are happy with the quality of the food served. During interviews with the staff members, four (4) out of four (4) did not corroborate the allegation. One of the staff members interviewed stated that they always ensure that there is a sufficient food supply in the facility and they ensure that there is a good variety of food as well. Another staff member interviewed stated that they go grocery shopping once per week and that snacks are always available for the clients in care. LPA checked the food supply of the facility, and it met the required two (2) day supply of perishable foods, as LPA observed that there was a sufficient quantity and variety of meats in the refrigerators and fridges, that none of it had expired, along with other perishable fruits and vegetables as well. The facility also met the requirement of a seven (7) day supply of non-perishable foods, however it had just enough to meet the requirement. LPA advised the facility staff that more non-perishable foods should be purchased and maintained at the facility.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided. |