1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility is not following program plan. It was reported that on two (2) dates; 9/21/24 & 11/30/24 staff conducted improper CPI holds on resident (R1). On 9/21/24, R1 was in the activity room and due to self-injurious behaviors staff determined a CPI hold was needed. However, the 3rd staff supported R1's head, which is not part of the program design. On 11/30/24, R1 was being non-compliant in the kitchen area, and former staff (S4) restrained the resident from behind by giving a bear hug and moving the resident. No other staff were involved in this incident. The facility has 2 CPI trainers. All 3 staff acknowledge the two aforementioned CPI incidents used improper CPI hold techniques that are not part of the program design emergency intervention training. CPI trainers stated they did not know that the program design does not allow head support holds. Based on record review, the program design Emergency Intervention Plan does not include any head support hold. Administrator is required to debrief with staff after each incident, but did not after the 11/30/24 incident. ELARC issued a Corrective Action Plan and CPI trainers are scheduled to conduct CPI training this month reflective of the program design.
Based on interviews conducted and document review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiency is being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Refer to LIC 9099D.
Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of appeal rights and report was issued. |