1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding: Payment was not authorized by resident.
It is alleged that staff withdrew an additional $400 in October 2025 without authorization from R1 even though rent is automatically withdrawn each month.
Interviews with S1 and S8 revealed that staff withdrew an additional $420.07 on 10/8/2025 for partial payment for September 2025 rent from R1’s account. Interview with S8, who is in charge of handling resident rent payments indicated that S8 provided R1 with a verbal reminder that R1 had a balance for the amount of $1,420.07 for September 2025 rent and therefore, R1 gave S8 verbal authorization to withdraw the money from R1’s account. S8 indicated that R1 authorized the withdrawal for the amount of $420.07 on 10/8/2025 as a partial payment for September 2025 rent and R1 agreed to pay the remaining $1,000.00 at a later time. S8 stated that S8 and R1 conducted a verbal payment plan so that R1 could pay off the remaining $1,000.00, but S8 did not document the terms of the payment plan at the time. S8 further indicated the authorization to withdraw the $420.07 from R1’s account was provided by R1 verbally, and nothing in writing was obtained from R1 to confirm the authorization from R1 to withdraw the additional $420.07 for September 2025 rent. Interview with R1 indicated that R1 did not authorize S8 to withdraw $420.07 on 10/8/2025 from R1’s account to pay off a portion of a balance for September 2025 rent. R1 indicated that R1 did not provide staff with verbal or written consent to withdraw the additional $420.07 on 10/8/2025. Interviews with R2-R9 indicated that they have no concerns with how the facility manages their rent payments. However, LPA review of payment history records indicated that on 10/6/2025, the facility processed a payment for October 2025 rent in the amount of $1,420.00 but also processed an additional payment in the amount of $420.07 on 10/8/2025. During record review, facility was unable to furnish email communications, correspondence or consent/authorization forms which would indicate that R1 authorized the additional withdrawal made on 10/8/2025 from R1’s account. Interviews and record review corroborate the allegation that staff withdrew an additional $420.07 from R1’s account without authorization.
The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulation (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Jacqueline Cortez, Executive Director and a copy of this report, 9099-D, and Appeal Rights was provided.
|