1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (continued from 9099)
09/26/2025 During this visit LPA obtained copy of staff and resident roster, and R1 admission agreement. On 09/27/2025 LPA obtained copy of R1 v=care plan.
The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Licensee did not abide by the terms and conditions of resident's admission agreement. It is alleged that the facility is charging R1 an extra fee to walk R1 dog even though R1 is able and still walks R1 dog.
LPA interviewed four (4) staff S#1 – S#4 and all four (4) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed ten (10) residents, and all ten (10) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Administrator, S1 stated that when R1 returns from grocery shopping, R1 struggles to carry grocery bags and hold resident’s pet dog’s leash and that R1 lets go of the leash and then the dog roams around and bothers other residents who have complaint to Administrator about it. The administrator told R1 that she may have to charge R1 extra to have staff assist R1 to make sure R1 does not let R1’s dog loose in the facility. Administrator stated that R1 never paid for this service and is not currently being charged for this service. LPA interviewed R1 and R1 stated that this is old news and that the Administrator is not charging R1 and R1 never paid a cent for this service. R1 stated R1 does not need this service and refused it. R1 stated resident is happy with this arrangement. There is insufficient evidence to support this allegation.
Based on records reviewed, interviews conducted, and observations indicate that, although the allegation may have happened is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was given to Alicia Aragon, Health Service Director
|