1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff restricted resident's visitation. It is alleged that the facility staff are restricting visitation between Resident #1 (R1) and one of their family members. It is alleged that the facility staff is supervising the visits, and the family member of R1 is only able to visit for a certain amount of time. LPA interviewed the Administrator and four (4) out of four (4) staff denied the allegation. However, based on staff interviews conducted, the Administrator confirmed that the facility has restricted R1’s visitation rights by limiting R1’s visitor to visit for only 30 minutes at a time, one day a week, and the visits are closely supervised by the Administrator. On 10/22/2024, R1’s family member was allowed to visit R1, however they were only allowed to visit for 30 minutes between 2:00pm-2:30pm and the visit was closely monitored by the Administrator. Facility staff provided a document from the Superior Court of California dated 12/18/2018 that indicated that prior to R1 being visited by this family member, the skilled nursing facility would have to be notified by telephone of the visit at least 24 hours ahead of time and the visit shall be monitored and shall be no longer than 2 hours in duration. However, this document does not discuss any restrictions related to assisted living facilities, it only mentions skilled nursing facilities. The Claremont Hacienda is a Residential Care Facility for The Elderly (RCFE) and not a Skilled Nursing Facility. The court documents that the facility is relying upon indicated only that Skilled Nursing facility visitation is limited. There is no documentation of a current restraining order and there was no other document provided by the facility to justify any limits on R1’s visitation. Five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed denied the allegation and all stated that they had no concerns on the people that visits them. Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted with facility staff, and facility residents, there was sufficient supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
Exit interview held with the Administrator, Ricardo Lara Perez and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. |