1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility staff not providing food in the quantity necessary to resident. It is alleged that the facility staff are not providing enough food which has caused R1 to be severely emaciated and lost 50 pounds since being admitted to the facility. No other details are provided. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed the Administrator and five (5) out of five (5) staff and they all denied the allegation. All staff interviewed indicated that all residents at the facility receive three meals and three snacks per day. All staff interviewed also indicated that facility provides a sufficient amount of food to all of the residents in care. LPA interviewed six (6) out of seven (7) residents all claim they get enough food from the facility staff. However, LPA interviewed one (1) out of seven (7) residents that stated not liking the food provided but the resident has own food that they eat in their room. LPA observed R1 and other residents eating their meal at the dining hall during lunch time from 12:05pm to 12:30pm. LPA observed eating the following items: Orange glazed chicken, fried rice, egg roll, seasoned broccoli florets, fruit cocktails, and beverage. R1 continued to eat while being assisted by S4. R1 was in a pleasant mood while continuing to eat lunch. S3 also noted that R1 eats 3 snacks a day provided by the facility at 10:30am, 2:30pm, and 7:30pm frequently. LPA observed under record review, R1 weighted in at 104lbs based on measuring by Left Mid-Arm Circumference (LMAC) at 19cm at the date of admission which was on 07/18/2024. LPA observed the Nurse’s Notes dated 11/25/2024, S3 measured R1’s left arm at today’s visit and it measured at 20cm which has been consistent. Therefore, evidence obtained shows that R1’s weight has remained consistent from her admission date up until today’s visit. LPA observed no concerns regarding residents not getting enough food from the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies were cited for this complaint investigation. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator. |