1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
It is alleged that resident’s responsible party has been attempting to obtain a copy of their records, but facility has not provided them even after requesting the record in writing. It is also alleged that responsible party has not been given any indication from the facility as to when they will receive them.
Interview with S1 indicated that the facility has a protocol in place for record requests. However, interview with S1 revealed that upon S1’s initial hire to the facility, S1 was still becoming familiar with the facility’s policies regarding resident document requests. When the initial request from R1’s responsible party was made to the corporate office to obtain R1’s records on 4/23/2026, S1 stated that they were waiting for corporate to follow-up due to S1 still becoming familiar with their role in the release of resident records. S1 stated that the facility did not refuse to provide R1’s responsible party with the requested records. S1 stated that R1’s responsible party eventually obtained R1’s records via email on 5/22/2026 during a visit they conducted to the facility. S1 stated that the facility does not have a specific turn-around time to follow up on record requests; however, S1 acknowledges that there was a communication breakdown and the request was not followed up by staff. S1 further indicates that staff communication could have been better and staff could have “acted quicker” to provide R1’s records to their responsible party. Interviews with (10) residents indicated that their needs are being met by facility staff and have no concerns regarding their care.
Interviews conducted corroborate the allegation that the facility did not provide R1’s responsible party with resident’s records in a timely manner. LPA substantiated the allegation above based on the evidence obtained during this investigation. A finding of substantiated means the allegation is valid because the evidence meets the preponderance of the evidence standard. LPA cited the deficiency below per California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22.
Exit interview was conducted with Debbie Valdez, Business Office Director, and a copy of the report, LIC 9099-D and Appeal Rights was provided.
|