1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The administrator explained that the business next door had just finished spraying a car and the fume was toxic. Multiple staff attempted to redirect C-1 from the building to get away from the fume. Since redirection was not successful and staff felt the urgency to remove client from the setting, it resulted in several staff carrying C-1 toward their day program. It was also noted that C-1 was resistive and combative while a staff was lifting the client, which made staff having to use a little more force to handle client. No bruises or injuries were noted when the incident occurred. Staff acknowledged C-1 likes going next door when client gets the chance and is able to redirect back to the facility on most occasions. They indicated they have CPI training and do not use restraints on the clients. They stated verbal redirection is normally used and have not utilized any restraints on clients. LPA interviewed an individual who witnessed a staff handling the client roughly during the incident that took place on 7/30/24.
Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 3), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted. The Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with the administrator via telephone. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. |