1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA also requested copies of the Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) file such as: Code of Conduct, Receipt of Acknowledgement of Employee Handbook, Criminal Background Clearance, Employee Warning Document, BLS training, On-the-Job Orientation Training, and Position Description. LPA interviewed R1 and the Administrator during the visit.
On 05/15/2025, LPA interviewed Staff #2 (S2), Staff #3 (S3), Staff #4 (S4), and the Administrator over the phone.
On 06/20/2025, LPA interviewed R1’s family member and obtained a photograph of R1’s injuries taken after the incident.
The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation: “Staff hit resident causing injury.” It is alleged that on 3/10/2025, at 5am, R1 was struck in the face by S1 resulting in a black eye when staff were attempting to change R1. Shortly after the incident, Claremont Police were called, and they arrived at the facility on 3/10/2025. LPA interviewed R1 and R1 indicated that they were “picking” at their eye because it was itchy and could not recall being hit by S1 or any other staff. LPA interviewed S1 and S1 denied the allegations stating that S1 did not hit or strike R1 in the face and S1 was unsure of how R1 had obtained the black right eye. LPA interviewed the Administrator and the Administrator stated that S1 was initially suspended pending an investigation, however at the conclusion of their internal investigation S1 was terminated because management felt reasonable suspicions that S1 had in fact struck R1 in the face. LPA interviewed S2 and S2 corroborated with the allegation stating that S2 witnessed S1 striking R1 on the face during the 03/10/2025 incident. S2 indicated that they were present during the interaction and S1 aggressively slapped R1 in the face when R1 was being combative with staff as they were attempting to change R1. LPA interview S3 and although S3 did not directly witness the incident, S3 corroborated the allegation by confirming that R1 had an injury near their right eye the day of the alleged incident. LPA obtained a copy of the police report from the Claremont Police Department that indicated that law enforcement responded to the facility to investigate the incident and the police officer observed redness and bruising around R1’s right eye. LPA also reviewed picture that was provided regarding R1’s injury and the picture shows redness around R1’s eye area. Based on staff and resident interviews, record review, there was sufficient evidence to corroborate with the allegations. |