1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in client wandering away from facility. It was alleged that participant departed the day program without staff supervision.
Interviewed Administrator admitted that the incident did occur. Administrator admitted that on 01/15/26 C1 left a facility without staff supervision. Following a comprehensive internal investigation it was determined C1's departure occurred without active supervision, reflecting a lapse in duty of care and adherence to established supervision protocols and assigned DSP /S1 did not properly communicated to supervisory staff or team resulting in a breakdown of supervision coverage. As a result of findings S1 was placed on administrative suspension and subsequently terminated on 02/02/26. Administrator mentioned that after the incident Administration held a meeting and in service training conducted for the staff. Materials for meeting and sign in sheet was provided to LPA. Review of facility and C1 files shows that when C1 chooses to leave the day program, facility staff will follow C1 at the respectful distance or walk with C1. LPA reviewed the regional center's investigation report, and it stated based on interviews and the review of facility documents, the allegation of lack of supervision was substantiated. LPA reviewed the surveillance footage and video recording viewed C1 leaving the program with no supervision. Interviewed S2 stated that they were noticed that on 01/15/26 around 11:20 am C1 enter the facility alone without supervision. Interviewed S3 stated that when the incident happened where C1 left a facility, they were not there. S3 knew about the incident because they had a meeting about it. Interviewed C1 stated that they left a facility to buy a snack. C1 was not able to remember the date when it happened.
Based on LPA interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found SUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was held and a copy of the report along with appeal rights were provided. |