1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Licensee did not maintain staffing ratios as contracted for client. It is alleged that the day program is not providing one-to care to participant/client (C1) because different staff were observed with the client at pick-up time. According to information obtained, the day program has a ratio of 1 staff per 3 clients, but client (C1) requires 1 to 1 supervision. Client (C1) was admitted to the program on 10/7/24 and discharged on 10/31/2024. A total of four (4) staff were interviewed, which included the two staff assigned to C1's one to one care. All staff denied the allegation. They stated that the client always had one-to-one care, and when C1's primary Life Skills Coach (S1) was out to lunch staff (S2) was assigned the care and supervision responsibility. If C1's primary and secondary staff were off or on break, then the day program assigns other staff that fill in with the 1 to 1 care. Per program Administrator, the day program employs 23 staff persons, and clients that require 1 to 1 care always receive required personal care and supervision. Regional Center Service Coordinator was interviewed and confirmed that the day program is funded for 1 to 1 care for client (C1), and most clients in the program have a 3 to 1 ratio. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the findings indicate the day program always provided 1 to 1 care and supervision for client (C1). Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Allegation: Staff did not ensure client was provided lunch. It is alleged that on 10/30/24 & 10/31/24, staff did not ensure client (C1) was fed lunch because they returned home with a full lunch pail. Of concern is that C1 requires administration of 1 noon medication that needs to be given within half hour of lunch meal. All staff and clients interviewed denied the allegation. Clients said that clients that require feeding assistance are always fed. Client (C1's) 1 to 1 care staff stated that when the client was first admitted to the program their mother instructed staff to feed the client all the food that was packed, and to tilt the client's head back and force feed the client. Life Skills coaches explained to C1's mother that they felt uncomfortable with following her feeding instructions, and that per program policy when a client pushes away the food or communicated, they did not want to be fed or eat, then staff would stop feeding the client. Per, Administrator the program provides person-centered services that includes supporting individuals to make their own decisions. Client (C1) is non-verbal but can communicate their likes and dislikes. According to staff interviews, C1 disliked pureed bananas. The client's medication was initially being given with the pureed bananas, but based on staff observations it was determined that the medication would be administered with chocolate pudding instead. Staff reported that C1's family often sent large amounts of food and water, but C1 did not always want to eat specific foods or the large amounts. During today’s visit, clients were observed being assisted with lunch meals. There is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted with Program Director Erick Vasquez. A copy of the report was issued. |