1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Complaint alleges that the facility staff handle residents in a rough manner. Based on interviews LPA Sarangi learned that the complainant was not able to recall any details of the incident including time, date, resident or staff involved. LPA was not able to identify any other witnesses to the alleged incident and was unable to prove or disprove the alleged incident that occurred.
Complaint alleges that the facility staff failed to provide adequate food service. During an interview with complainant LPA learned that complainant alleged that there has been ants and hair in food served and, at times, the portions are too small and are either under or over cooked. Complainant was unable to identify when this occurred, provide any supporting items such as pictures and confirmed that facility will provide second helpings anytime a resident wants more food. Based on multiple interviews with residents, staff and outside parties LPA was unable to identify any other witnesses that have observed ants or hair in food and all felt that the quantity and quality of the food were acceptable. Based on observations, LPA Sarangi and Fernandes-Goes found the food service to be adequate during a facility tour on December 21, 2020. LPA was not able to gather sufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegation.
Complaint alleges licensee failed to ensure that the common parts of the facility are not maintained at a comfortable temperature, clean and sanitary at all times and repairs were made in a timely manner. Complainant was unable to recall concerns of repairs not being made in a time manner. Based on observations during virtual tours of the facility on December 21, 2020 at 01:50 PM and February 24, 2021 at approximately 12:30 PM LPAs observed the common areas of the facility to be clean and in good repair including but not limited to the kitchen, which was observed to be clean in good condition with food properly stored and bathrooms, which were clean and supplied with paper towels. LPA Sarangi and Fernandes-Goes observed the temperature to be 74 degrees in the dining hall and 75 degree on the first floor bistro which fall within Title 22 regulations. All other common areas were found to be clean and in good repair at the time of the Virtual Tours. Based on interview with multiple residents and outside parties LPAs were unable to identify any other witness that had concerns of the temperature or condition of the property.
Based on the interviews that were conducted, the observation of the facility and the documents/evidence reviewed, the allegations of, Facility staff handle residents in a rough manner, Facility staff failed to provide adequate food service, Facility staff failed to provide a comfortable temperature for the residents, Facility staff failed to keep the facility clean, Facility is in disrepair and Facility is unsanitary is Unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. |