1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099
There is an allegation of “Staff did not follow physician’s orders.” Review of C1’s medication orders stated the following: Clonazepam, 1mg tablet every 2 hours; 1-2 tablets anytime of day, all at once or separately. Max 2 tabs per day. Review of C1’s electronic medication authorization record (EMAR) showed that C1 was administered 1 tablet of clonazepam at 8:09PM on 05/09/2025 and at 6:15PM on 05/11/2025. Further review of C1’s Electronic Medication Authorization Record (EMAR) and facility documents showed that on 5/10/2025, C1 was administered 1 tablet of clonazepam at 7PM and 2 tablets of clonazepam at 10:11PM, which exceeded the maximum dose allowed per physician orders.
There is an allegation of “Staff did not allow resident to return to facility.” Per complaint, after being discharged from a behavioral crisis center, C1 was told they could not return to the facility. Interview with Chief Operating Officer (COO) revealed that on May 11, 2025, C1 had been yelling, screaming, and was emotionally deregulated so the San Rafael Police Department (SRPD) was contacted. Per COO, they contacted SRPD because C1 had been screaming and hitting themselves with a plastic cup causing their forehead to become swollen and form a bruise. C1 was sent to the hospital and placed on a 5150 hold. Per COO, C1 required one-on-one supervision which couldn’t be provided as C1 wanted to stay outside to smoke and be on their phone and they needed staff to be inside the house to supervise. COO further stated that C1 was not allowed to return to the facility because they required a higher level of care due to them screaming and threatening to self-harm themselves adding that these behaviors made the environment unsafe for C1 and the other clients in the home. Per interview with the Clinical Director, C1 was not reassessed by facility once ready for discharge and facility refused to bring C1 back. C1 was not provided an eviction notice at the time of refusal. Interview with COO and review of facility documents showed that an eviction notice was not provided to C1.
Based on interviews conducted, record review and observations made, these allegations are Substantiated. A finding that the Complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment.
Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights, discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.
|