1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For allegation that resident became severely dehydrated in the facility
During FM’s interview, FM stated that after R1 was discharged back to the facility on 04/28/20, R1’s health began declining rapidly and was not able to feed self. FM stated that R1 has not been eating well but R1 still ate food and drank water and an Ensure drink. FM stated that they hired a private caregiver to help R1 eat. FM would also come to the facility to assist R1 eat on certain days. FM stated that the last day FM assisted R1 was on 05/30/20 and R1 ate and appeared to be okay and did not appear to be sick.
On 07/09/20, the department contacted the private caregiver agency that FM hired and interviewed agency staff (AS1 and AS2). AS1 stated they were hired on 05/14/2020 to assist R1 eat because R1 wouldn’t eat unless fed. AS2 stated R1 understood that they were hired to assist R1 with eating because R1 didn’t eat enough. AS2 stated that R1 was able to communicate if R1 was tired, felt sick or was in pain. On 05/30/20, AS2 did not mention R1 appearing to be sick and needing to go to the hospital since staff document when they notice something unusual with R1. AS2 stated that R1 never complained but on 05/31/20, when AS2 arrived at the facility, R1 did not seem well and when asked how R1 felt, R1 stated “not good” so AS2 called the agency and FM to inform them of the situation. AS2 also notified staff at facility.
Based on interviews and records review, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur. Therefore, the Department found the above allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited during today’s compliant investigation tele-visit. Exit interview conducted with and a copy of this report e-mailed to Amy Saulnier for review and signature. |