1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Licensee also decided to care for a smaller number of children due to lack of staffing. S1 further claimed that one parent tried to re-enroll a child at a later date in which S1 advised of an opening on 06/01/2022 but it was not soon enough for that parent.
Two staff (S1- S2) were interviewed on 5/25/22, two prior staff (PS1 & PS2) were interviewed 8/8/22/& 8/9/22, and eight parents (P1- P8) were interviewed from 8/10/22-8/12/22. In addition, various documents were reviewed and observations were made.
On Friday, 04/29/22, three teachers resigned abruptly, leaving the facility without enough staff to accommodate all of the attending children. Parent interviews did confirm that S1 sent an email over the weekend explaining the situation and the need to downsize. It also noted the facility’s closure on Monday, 05/03/22. There were some inconsistent statements whether or not S1 requested volunteers to dissenroll their children or parents voluntarily found other child care. P1- P7 stated that the communication with the S1 was not good but none said that they were forced to dissenroll their child. One parent claimed the S1 would not communicate whether or not the child was still able to attend, however, according to S1, communication was provided.
S1 further claimed that the parent verbally disenrolled the child but then attempted to re-enroll the child on 5/12/22 when space was not available. PS2 also stated that a couple of weeks after the staff resigned, parents requested care from her directly but was not yet able to provide the care. The enrollment and withdrawal procedures noted in the Parent Handbook/Application were reviewed but they did not specifically address this type of occurrence and conflicting statements could not confirm whether children were withdrawn from care or inappropriately disenrolled.
Based on the investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was read and discussed in detail with the Licensee, Brenna Roth. No title 22 violations were cited. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days from today. |