1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099...
Administrator provided an email sent to R1’s responsible party dated 1/28/22 at 6:29pm confirming this information and offering a total credit in the amount of $2617.74 for December 20, 2021 to January 24, 2022. The credit will be over 6 months at $436.29 a month and any late fee for January will be waived as well. Administrator also provided R1’s assessment summaries performed every 6 months since 12/1/2020 to the present indicating R1’s changes of condition. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
It was also alleged that Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents in care. Reporting party alleges that the facility often operates with limited caregivers, but the facility is asking for an increase in fees. On 1/31/22 R1 smelled very strong odor of urine, reporting party asked R1 when was the last day that they had a shower and R1 replied forty-eleven Sundays ago. Based on records review and confidential interviews with Administrator the facility has been experience a shortage of staffing due to the pandemic and temporary staffing agencies had been contacted to bring staff on shift to meet resident’s needs. LPA obtained staff schedules for the Memory Care Unit for the month of January 2022 with a census of 17 residents in care revealed that on the following dates and times 1/3/22 between 2pm-6pm; 1/6/22, 1/10/22, 1/11/22, 1/13/22 and 1/17/22 between 10:30pm-6:30am there was only one caregiver on duty. On 3/21/22 LPA conducted confidential interviews with Memory Care Unit staff from different shifts confirmed that there had been times where they have worked alone during their shifts. Sometimes, they also get some help from Med-technicians. Per Administrator, she doesn’t allow staff to work alone and there had been times that her Wellness Director stayed later at nights to help with floor coverage. However, facility provided alarm response reports dated 1/23/22 to 1/27/22 indicated that staff response times to help residents in care were over 20 minutes as following: 8 times on 1/23/22; 21 times on 1/24/22; 7 times on 1/25/22; 8 times on 1/26/22 and 2 times on 1/27/22. Per Administrator, there was an error that the facility could not provide call response log for the dates between 1/28/22 to 1/31/22 due that they could not go back further because the system did not allow it, but ensures that there was a staff meeting about response times and there was a staff who was terminated because was taking more than normal helping residents in care. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. |