1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst Leibert contacted Administrator Wayne Panchesson for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. A tele-visit was conducted due to the COVID - 10 precautions. LPA did not physically visit the site. Complainant alleges that the facility illegally evicted R1 by refusing the allow R1 to return to the facility following a medical procedure. Facility alleges that the Responsible Person (RP) for R1 made the decision to place R1 in another facility following a care plan conference where there was agreement that a new placement would be best for R1. During the course of this investigation, this Department has interviewed staff and witnesses and obtained and reviewed documents. The following determinations have been made: There are differing opinions as to what transpired at the care conference; The written summary of the care conference indicates there was agreement by the parties that a new placement should be made; The conference was done by phone and the RP claims that RP did not agree to the replacement plan and did not sign the summary report; No actual signature by RP is on the report; RP did sign R1 into the new placement. Although an illegal eviction may have occurred, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did, or did not, occur. Therefore, the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED |