1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099…
Based on confidential interviews conducted with residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4), staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6) and records obtained from Napa Police Department, case# NPD2-1002351 dated 9/23/21; R1’s discharge documents provided by facility dated 10/4/21 for incident involving R1 that occurred on 5/29/21 concluded that the event had occurred, but there is no evidence to prove that personal rights were violated at the time of the incident. A finding that the complaint allegation personal rights is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation of facility staff did not provide supervision. Per reporting party, it was alleged that the day of the incident R2 had to call 911 because they don’t have anyway to get the attention of the caregivers in the front and there are concerns about call light system working properly. Based on visits conducted on 9/9/21 and 9/22/21 staff were present and appeared to be sufficient staff to meet resident’s needs. LPA obtained staff schedules for the months of May, June and July 2021 that appears that facility has provided enough staff to meet resident’s needs. However, hourly monitoring sheets provided by facility revealed that on 5/29/21 R1 was not assisted with incontinence care during the timeframe of 6am to 7am of next day. Per R1’s service plan dated 2/8/21 which was not signed by resident or responsible party indicated that R1 will be provided with full assist: “security checks every two hours and as needed”; “R1 requires one bed check per night per safety reasons”. R1 has a diagnosis of Severe Dementia on their physician report dated 10/16/20 that requires full assistance with some ADLs including standby assist while using the bathroom. LPA will address that facility is not following their plan of operation on a case management inspection. LPA confirmed call light system is working. Although there are concerns in response time.
A finding that the complaint allegation facility staff did not provide supervision is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|