1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | A4 disclosed the following: On 11/10/21, A1 told A4 about the bruise. A1 noticed the bruise on C1’s right arm when A1 changed C1’s clothes. C1 told A1 C1 jumped off from the toy box at school and got hurt. A4 asked C1 about the bruise and C1 just said “Nothing”. On Friday 11/12/21 when C1 visited C1’s father, C1 told the father the teachers at school grabbed C1’s arm because C1 threw a tantrum causing a bruise.
LPA Nguyen attempted to interview eight parents by phone and was able to interview six parents. Interviewed parents had no issues or concerns about the facility.
Based on the information gathered from LPA' interviews, reviewing pictures, and records, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the daycare child sustained bruises while in care, did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalty of $100. “The licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.” This report LIC 9099 was provided to the director. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report.
End of Report
|