1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED FROM LIC9099
An additional follow-up facility visit was conducted on November 15, 2022. LPA attempted or conducted interviews with a total of thirteen (13) individuals receiving care and supervision at the facility.
Regarding the allegation that Facility did not allow resident visitors, the following has been concluded: Based on observation, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff members and residents at the facility, LPA was able to confirm that the facility did not voluntarily bar individuals from accessing the facility and visiting residents but occasionally referred to current guidelines issued by the Department in relation to COVID-19-related precautions to require visitors' current vaccination documentation before authorizing visits. The facility declined to provide residents' relatives with a blanket authorization to visit their loved ones, but was not found responsible of interfering with personal rights. As a result, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation that Resident did not receive their mail, the following has been concluded: Facility staff does not access residents' mailboxes on their behalf and does not have the keys to any individual mailbox, unless specifically authorized. Facility staff is therefore unable to tamper with any individual mail. The only reason for mail not to be delivered was identified to be a discrepancy in the postal information used to send mail to a resident. As a result, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation that Resident was not allowed to receive phone calls, the following has been concluded: Residents are issued individual phone numbers that route call directly into their individual units. In the event a caller chooses to call the front desk to ask for a specific unit instead, there were no evidence of instructions to screen calls provided to front desk staff for any reason whatsoever. As a result, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative. |