1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Page 2)
During the investigation, LPA Lucero interviewed six (6) staff members and 3 parents.
The following information reflects a summary of events as reported during staff interviews regarding the allegation. One staff member stated that management became aware of the incident after C1’s parent reported it to management. Staff reported that S1 was questioned regarding the incident and S1 stated they were unaware that the incident had occurred. Staff further stated that, due to this incident and other unrelated matters, S1 was subsequently terminated. Staff indicated that the incident appeared to involve C1 and another child disputing over a toy, which resulted in C1 sustaining a scratch to the cheek. Additional staff members were unable to provide further information regarding the incident.
Parents interviewed reported no concerns relating to this allegation.
Based on LPA Lucero’s interviews with staff, it was determined that due to a lack of supervision, a child sustained an injury. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, and the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 101229(a)(1), Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with Assistant Director Isabela Jaimes. A Notice of Site Visit was issued and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal rights were explained, and the Director was provided a copy of the Appeal Rights form (LIC 9058 01/16). The Director’s signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.
End of Report. |