1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Page 2) During investigation, LPA conducted interviews with six (6) staff, four (4) parents, two (2) children, and obtained pertinent documents.
During record review, LPA reviewed incident reports, correspondence, a name-to-face transition, and photos related to Child #1’s (C1) injury. The incident report documented that on April 9, 2026, at approximately 10:30 a.m., C1 was bitten on the shoulder while the children were lining up to enter the classroom from the playground. The report identified Staff 5 (S5) and Staff 6 (S6) as the staff present at the time of the incident. The report was dated and signed by the director on April 9, 2026. Correspondence showed that at 6:50 p.m. on April 9, 2026, C1’s authorized representative notified the director that C1 had returned home with bite marks and bruising. The authorized representative also stated that the family had not been notified of the injury or provided with an incident report. At 9:08 a.m. on April 10, 2026, the director responded that they had spoken with the classroom teachers and that staff would complete additional reports to ensure that parents were informed. The classroom name-to-face transition sheet showed that S5 and S6 were signed in with the classroom at 10:30 a.m. on April 9, 2026. However, the transition sheet confirmed only that the staff were present with the classroom and did not establish that either staff member witnessed the incident.
During staff interviews, all staff interviewed stated that incident reports are completed for injuries and observations. S5 and S6 stated that they did not witness C1 being bitten, did not observe the injury, and did not know which child caused the injury. S6 stated that they first became aware of the injury after S5 showed them a message from C1’s authorized representative. S5 stated that they did not recall observing the bite or noticing bite marks on C1. No staff member interviewed reported witnessing the bite or identified the source of the specific time, location, and circumstances documented in the incident report 04/09/2026.
During the course of the investigation, LPA noticed that the information recorded in the incident report was inconsistent with the statements provided by the staff identified as being present at the time of the incident. In addition, the available correspondence indicated that S5 and S6 became aware of the injury after C1’s authorized representative contacted the facility.
LPA conducted parent interviews. One parent expressed concerns about their child coming home with bruises on multiple occasions. During those incidents, the authorized representatives were not informed of the child’s bruises. LPA attempted to interview C1 but was unable to due to their age and limited verbal development. (Continue to page 3) |