1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation “Staff argue in the presence of children.” S1 denied knowledge of any incident where staff argued in front of children. S2 reported hearing something about S5 and another staff member but stated they did not know details and were not present. S3 was on a break during an incident between former staff Adult #1 (A1) and S5 and did not witness it. S3 added that A1 and S5 did not get along. Both S4 and S5 denied knowledge of any incident occurring in front of children. Adult #2 (A2) stated that S5 sometimes spoke in an inappropriate tone in front of the children to adults in front of the children. A2 recalled one incident where S5 yelled at them regarding supplies for a ceramic activity, refusing to provide the materials unless a “witness” was present, though no such policy existed. Adult #3 (A3) stated that S5 argued with them in front of the children. A3 stated that S5 confronted them in front of children while they were reading during breaks. S5 told A3 not to read to children during breaks. On one occasion, S5 placed their hands on their hips and stated in front of children that A3 was still on probation and should be let go. A3 stated that S5 frequently challenged them. One of five parents interviewed expressed concern about S5. Parent #3 (P3) stated that S5 argued in front of them and children. P3 reported that S5 demanded S3 take a break immediately, in front of P3 and the children. S3 preferred to wait until the children were settled, but S5 insisted. P3 also stated that staff changes were not communicated to parents. All three children interviewed did not make any disclosures.
Based on interviews conducted and documents obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division Section 101223(a)(2) 101223(a)(1) Personal Rights, Type B is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Please refer to attached 9099D for documentation of deficiencies.
Exit interview was conducted. The facility representative was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Appeal Rights were explained. The facility representative was provided with a copy of the appeal rights and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Regional Office within 15 business days. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager at the address listed above.
Page 2 of 2. End of Report.
|