1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
Reporting Party (RP) alleges (1) Staff does not have ECE units and is not qualified, and (2) Licensee does not ensure facility operates within ratio at all times.
During the investigation, LPA interviewed four staff, interviewed five parents, and reviewed staff files.
Staff does not have ECE units and is not qualified, RP alleges an unqualified staff #1 (S1) does not have ECE units and is caring for children alone. On 8/7/2024, LPA conducted staff interviews. Three staff interviewed stated S1 is an assistant and is not allowed to provide care for children alone. LPA interviewed S1, and S1 stated she has never been left alone with children. LPA reviewed S1 file, and S1 is listed as an assistant teacher. Assistant teachers are not required to have ECE units when assisting a fully qualified teacher.
Licensee does not ensure facility operates within ratio at all times. LPA conducted interviews with four staff. All staff stated they have never been out of ratio and hasn’t observed other staff being out of ratio. All staff interviewed knew what the ratio for infants and toddlers. The facility was found to be in ratio during today’s visit and during previous visits on 8/7/2024, 8/1/2024, and 7/17/2024.
Parent interviews were conducted. LPA contacted nine parents via phone call. Out of nine parents, five parents were able to be interviewed. Parents interviewed did not divulge and information pertaining to the allegations.
Children were not interviewed due to age and being nonverbal.
Based LPA observation, documentation, interviews with staff and parents, there was not enough evidence to substantiate the allegations.
The Orange County Child Care Office has investigated the complaint alleging (1) Staff does not have ECE units and is not qualified, and (2) Licensee does not ensure facility operates within ratio at all times: although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Assistant Director Johanna Campos.
Notice of Site Visit was provided to Assistant Director and posted on the door. The notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The licensee was provided a copy of their appeal right (LIC 9058 1/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. Exit interview was conducted. |