1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Page 3)
S3 stated being unsure how the gate came undone, because S1, S2, and S3 make sure the dogs are locked behind the gate before the children arrive. S3 assumes it could have been the dog who was able to push the gate door open because it wanted to free itself and the latch wasn't properly secured, or it could of been a child who managed to open the gate door.
During facility visit on 11/02/2023, LPA conducted a facility inspection. LPA observed an approximately 4-foot wood fence in the side patio with 2 dogs locked behind it. Gate is locked using a sliding bolt.
On 12/19/2023, LPA Lucero interviewed 4 children. C2 stated they do not recall being present at the time of the incident. C2 stated not being aware that there are dogs at the facility. Child #3 (C3) stated there are two dogs at the facility but dogs are always locked behind a gate and never come out. C3 stated staff do not let children go near the side patio gate where the dogs are located because S1 has told me the dogs might bite them. C3 denied ever seeing a dog bite a child. Child #4 (C4) stated there are two dogs at the facility locked behind a gate. C4 stated never seeing a dog come outside the gate near the children and that S1 informed C4 not to go near the gate because the dogs may bite them. C4 denied ever seeing a dog bite a child. Child #5 (C5) stated there are two dogs at the facility and are always locked behind a gate. C5 denied ever observing the dogs outside of the gate. C5 stated S1 informed children to not go near the dogs because they might bite them. C5 denied ever seeing a dog bite a child.
LPA obtained and reviewed medical records for C1. Records show C1 was treated for a dog bite on 10/30/2023.
The licensee also filed a self reported unusual incident report with the licensing office regarding the dog bite incident on 10/31/2023.
Based on LPA’s interviews conducted with reporting party, 3 staff, unusual incident report filed, and medical records obtained it has been determined child sustained injury by licensee's dog due to lack of supervision. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, 102417(a) Operation of a Family Child Care Home is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
(continue to page 4) |