1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 9099C
Complainant alleged that the licensee makes a lot of inappropriate comments include threatened a child who is within hearing range and has called a child, “annoying and a stupid girl’.
During the staff interviews, all staff denied violating any children’s personal rights. However, staff spoke inappropriately to a child by calling the child’s name and threatening the child when misbehavior was inconsistent.
LPA Nguyen attempted to interview the children in care but only 2 were qualified for the interview. The two children interviewed stated teachers are very nice, and they like coming to school. No disclosures were made by children.
LPA Nguyen called 8 parents, LPA was able to interview 3 parents on 08/23/23. All parents interviewed made no disclosures, parents did not express any concerns with the care given to the children, or any issue with any staff at the facility.
Based on LPA facility inspections, observations, interviews conducted with complainant, 3 staff members, 2 children, 3 parents, and records reviewed by LPA, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations licensee threatened and speaks inappropriately to children in care. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with licensee, Chi Vu. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The licensee was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above. |