1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interview with the complainant: On 9/5/2023, the complainant alleged that he/she was able to walk into the facility during pick up time without knocking because the alley door was unlocked. That complainant asserted that another day during pick up time the alley door was open while children were playing in the backyard without supervision.
Interview with staff: On 9/5/2023 the licensee Martha Jauregui was interviewed about the allegations. The licensee could not confirm or deny the allegations happened.
Interview with children: On 10/06/23, the LPAs interviewed five (5) school age children. All five children were qualified. All five children consistently asserted that there are adults with them when children are in the outside play area. All five children identified the adults by name.
Interview with Parents: On 10/6/2023, the LPAs called seven (7) parents. The LPAs reached one parent; the parent refused to answer any of the LPAs questions. The other six (6) parents could not be reached.
LPAs Observations: On 10/6/2023, the LPAs observed five school age children in the outside play area supervised by one adult.
Based on the LPA’s observations and conducted interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with licensee Martha Jauregui. The Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The director was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The director was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First-level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above. |