1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
Licensee stated that she encouraged C1 to eat and drink, while C1 was in her care from 10:30am-5pm (hours sometime vary). Licensee stated that she also offers food if the children are still hungry. Licensee stated that she communicated with the parents via text messages and emails about C1, licensee provided information to LPA for viewing.
On 1/23/23, LPA interviewed 5 children in care. No disclosures were made by the 4 children and LPA was not able to qualify 1 child.
On 12/28/2019 and 1/19/2023 respectively, LPA called 9 parents and interviewed 6 of the 9 parents. There were no disclosures from the 5 parents interviewed. No disclosures were made from the 4 parents and LPA did not receive a return call from 3 parents.
Based on interviews conducted, the complaint alleging staff did not meet the day care child’s needs is found to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. Director was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Director was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. |