1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | page 2
In reference to the allegation; Provider did not attend to day care child's needs. LPA interviewed two parents who did not divulge any concerns with care being provided. Licensee's interview indicated she has not let a child cry without attending to it. Licensee also stated that if a child cries that is because something is wrong and if she is unable to console the child she contact's the parents to see if there were any issues she needs to be aware of. If child continues to cry inconsolably she would call the parent to come pick them up but this has not happened in years. LPA's observations of children on 09/14/22 in the AM and 12/02/22 in the PM noted children playing, eating, watching television. LPA observed licensee attending to children. LPA was unable to qualify children. Based on the available information the allegation Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
In reference to the allegation; Provider did not provide a comfortable temperature for day care children in care. Licensee stated that she has a portable (air conditioning ) AC unit and it is constantly on at 69 degrees, it has been working without fail this whole summer. On 09/14/22 LPA observed portable a/c unit in place and temperature reading at 69 degrees. On 12/01/22 portable AC unit was not in place, per licensee it was in storage for winter. LPA viewed NEST heating system set at 73 degrees during visit on 12/02/22. Interview with two parents indicated they have seen a portable a/c unit in the facility. Interview with licensee's son who sets the equipment in the facility indicated he set the temperature of the portable a/c unit at 69 degrees. Based on the available information the allegation Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
continued on page 3 |