1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Duron interviewed one volunteer parent at the facility, and contacted five parents by phone and was able to interview three parents. All interviewed parents stated they did not have any concern with facility.
Based on LPA’s interviews, observations and reviewing records, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 Section Section 102417 Operation of a Family Child Care (g)The home shall be free from defects or conditions which might endanger a child. Please refer to attached 9099D for documentation of deficiencies. Please refer to attached 9099D for documentation of deficiencies.
This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on LPA’s observations of fence having nails exposed, which poses a potential health risk to the children in care.
An exit interview was completed. The report was reviewed and discussed. Appeal Rights were provided. The facility representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Licensing office within 15 business days. Any proposed changes to the physical plant, including telephone number, shall be immediately reported to the Department.
The facility representative was informed that the “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in Civil Penalties of $100.00. The “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted on or adjacent to the door.
|