1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed staff members. Staff members interviewed stated licensee does not reside at the licensed facility.
LPA Duron did not interview children due to their age and being non-verbal. LPA interviewed parents. All interviewed parents stated they did not have any concern with facility.
Based on LPA’s interview the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation has been found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 Section 102352 Definitions (h)(1) see page 9099D.
This requirement is met as evidence by: based on interview , Staff #1 (S1) stated licensee owns home but does not sleep at home, which poses a potential health and safety risk to the children in care.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative Minoo Sobhani.
Page 2 of 2. End of Report. |