1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 4 of 5
Staff # 2 (S1) stated they roll C1 on the back whenever C1 is rolling.
S3 stated they put the babies on their back. If they roll over, they do it themselves.
S4 stated I lay the baby on the back. If they roll over on themselves, we let them do on their own. If we don't know, we roll them on the back if not sleeping. We know which child rolls and which child does not.
S5 stated they put the babies on their back. If they roll over themselves, they don't turn them.
S6 stated they put babies to sleep on their back. It depends on the child. C1 could roll from back to tommy and not from tommy to back. C1 was not observed to roll over.
S7 stated It depends on the child's status. If they can roll over, they do it on their own.
Regarding the Aide was left alone supervising infants
Staff did not confirm that the aides supervise children while being left alone. The aides who work in the infant room confirmed that they always work with a teacher. LPA reviewed the qualification for staff in the infant room. When interviewed with staff, they stated the arrangement with the name of the staff in the room. LPA found that the combination of teacher and aid are arranged supervising children and not aide alone. Staff stated they know who a qualified teacher is and who is an aid. The aids understand that they cannot be left alone with children without a presence of a teacher. They said aides are not alone with children. One teacher and two aides might have been working together when they have a maximum of 12 infants but not two aides together.
Based on the interviews with seven staff, nine (9) year old child (C2), contacting ten random parents of whom one responded with no concerns regarding the allegations, and reviewing relevant documents, such as records of staffs' times and sign in/out sheet for children, and internal Name to Face Transition Record, there are not enough evidence, or witness to support the above allegations. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging 1) Infant room is out of ratio, 2) Staff covered an infant’s mouth with their hand to stop from crying, 3) Infant room is not sanitized, 4) staff falsifying child was fed on sprout app, 5) Infant Sleep Plan not given to parent /in child file, 6) Aide was left alone supervising infants, “although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove, the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Continued on page 5 |