1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interview with the complainant: On 11/7/2023, the LPA called the reporting party (RP), according to the interview, RP stated that prior to this incident, in December 2022 or January 2023 RP provided the facility with new prescription EpiPen, RP then asked the facility to return the expired medication, but facility could not locate the medication. But medication was given back after.
Interview with staff: On 12/19/2023, LPA interviewed one staff, Staff #3 (S3). S3 stated that when Parent (P1) asked for the expired medication, first, they could not locate the medication, but were able to find it the same day in C1s classroom inside the teachers cabinet. S3 called P1 that medication is found. P1 stated it will be picked up the following day.
Based on the interviews conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Director, Melissa Wojick, The Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The Director was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The director was provided with a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First-level appeals should be sent to the Regional Manager to the address listed above.
|