1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Nguyen conducted the interview with three staff members via telephone. No disclosures were made by staffs to LPA Nguyen. All interviewed staff members denied of not ensure the safety of daycare children. No staff member disclosed witnessing subject child sustained injury while in care. All interviewed staff members stated they would immediately take care of the children if the children were being hurt, document the incidents, and notify the parents.
During the staff interviewed, LPA learned that on 8/14/2020, child #1 threatened to kill child #2 with a knife and child #2 was also threatening to kill child #1. Both children were terminated from the program as they violated the program policy.
LPA Nguyen contacted five parents by phone and was able to interview three parents. All three interviewed parents stated they did not have any concern or issue with the facility. Interviewed parents stated the facility always informs them if their children got hurt.
LPA Nguyen conducted interview to 3 children. No disclosures were made by children to LPA Nguyen. All interviewed children disclosed they like going to the school. The children also stated if the children got hurt, the staff would check out the injury areas, clean it, and let their parents know about it. Children did not know or acknowledge any children were threatening to kill each other.
LPA attempted to contact child #1 and child#2 multiple times but both children were unable to be reached as they were no longer attending the program.
The review of Anaheim Police Report indicated on 8/14/21, a police officer visited child #2 home and interviewed child #2. Child #2 disclosed to the police officer that child #1 threatened to kill child #2 with a knife but child #1 did not have any knife. Child #2 did not disclose child #2 threatened to kill child #1. The case was closed as there is no crime involved.
Based on the interviews conducted and reviewing records, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged staff did not ensure the safety of daycare children and daycare child sustained injury while in care did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was not posted due to tele-investigation Covide-19 State of Emergency. Appeal Rights was explained. A copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) will be provided through email and their signatures on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report. |