1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of Report)
During the investigation, LPA interviewed 14 staff members and reviewed staff records.
During interviews, 10 out of 14 interviewed staff confirmed that S1 helped in the classroom 1-2 times a week to assist the teachers in the classroom and to cover teachers' breaks, ranging from a few minutes to 1 hour. All interviewed staff denied witnessing S1 ever worked alone with the children. S1 denied working alone with the children and stated S1 would fill in to help in a classroom with a fully qualified teacher.
During record review, S1's file showed that S1 has no ECE units but met personnel requirements to work at the facility.
According to Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, Section 101216.3 Teacher-Child Ratio (h) Persons employed for clerical, housekeeping and maintenance functions shall not be included as teachers in the teacher-child ratio. (1) The licensee may use such persons as emergency substitutes for teachers while a qualified teacher substitute is being secured.
Based on the information gathered from LPA's interviews conducted with 14 staffs and record reviews of staff's file, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation Staff are not qualified to care and supervise day care children. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that Staff are not qualified to care and supervise day care children, did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated.
Appeal Rights were discussed. The facility representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Regional Office within 15 business days. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Director Karla Barba.
|