1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 9099C
During the course of the investigation, LPA Nguyen conducted two (2) physical plant inspections, interviewed five (5) staff members, two (2) parents, the complainant, attempted to interviewed children, obtained facility children's roster, reviewed one (1) child's file, parent and employee handbooks.
During the staff interview, all the staff interviewed stated that the facility is in compliance with children's personal rights regulations. Staff #1 (S1) stated S1 immediately intervened C1 and C2 to prevent them kicking each other. Staff #5 (S5) stated the video footage showed C1 kicked the other child and C2 attempted to kick C1 back. S1 intervened and stepped in between the children, who were attempting to kick each other between S1’s legs. Prior to this moment, S1 was tending to another child 5 feet away.
On 04/09/2025, LPA contacted 11 parents requesting an interview. Two (2) parents were reached. The interviewed parents did not express any concerns related to the allegation and did not provide any information that could corroborate the allegation. The rest of the parents did not respond to the Department’s request for an interview.
LPA attempted to interview four (4) children, however; the children were not qualified for the interview due to being too young.
Based on LPA’s observations, document reviews and interviews, the preponderance evidence to prove allegation staff failed to intervene resulting in child being hurt by peers was not met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged staff failed to intervene resulting in child being hurt by peers did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Maria Tejeda-Ruiz. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. Licensee was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. |