1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 4 staff, 5 children, 3 parents, and reviewed facility files.
Reporting Party (RP) stated a confidential video of Child 2 (C2) was shared to Child 1 (C1)’s representative.
LPA interviewed staff, Staff 1 (S1) stated they were aware that an internal video monitoring was sent to the wrong recipient. Staff 2 (S2) admitted to accidentally sending an internal video monitoring to C1’s representative, making them delete the Bright Wheel account of C1. S2 stated that only the licensee has access and can view the video footage of the facility.
LPA interviewed 3 parents, none of the parents interviewed disclosed information that supported the allegation
LPA interviewed 5 children, none of the children interviewed disclosed information that supported the allegation
Based on records obtained, there was a communication between the facility and C1’s representative confirming that an internal video monitoring was wrongfully sent to C1’s representative.
Based on interview and record reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation on Staff did not ensure that daycare child's records were kept confidential is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See LIC9099D for 1 Type B violation.
Exit interview was conducted with Director Jaylena Ulibarri. Report and deficiency were discussed. The Notice of Site Visit was posted and must remain posted for 30 consecutive days. Appeal Rights were provided.
Page 2 of 2
|