1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA inspected the facility and confirmed that the old style has a sink that goes up to the toilet and could possibly be used as a grab bar, but Room 165 does not have separate grab bar installed on the sink and the edge of the sink does not provide the same gripping surface as a true grab bar, meaning it does not meet the requirement that every toilet have a grab bar. In addition, LPA noted room 206 has the new style where the sink does not reach the toilet and there is no grab bar installed on the toilet.
Regarding the allegation that staff did not complete a reappraisal on resident in care: it was alleged that in January 2022, R1 had a fall resulting in decreased arm mobility and the facility did not conduct a reappraisal or update R1’s care plan prior to R1 leaving the facility in February 2022. LPA reviewed R1’s care notes which document that on December 15, 2021, R1 had a fall, went to the hospital, and was picked up by their family to stay with their family. Per R1’s MAR, R1 returned to the facility on January 6, 2022. LPA reviewed R1’s care notes which document that on December 22, 2021, facility staff communicated with R1’s family regarding R1’s change of condition after their fall and documented R1’s new care needs and how they would be met. LPA reviewed a copy of R1’s service plan marked up on January 6, 2022 by the facility’s wellness director at the time that documents R1’s new care needs and documents that the facility would use a wheelchair for R1, but this document was never finalized. Per R1’s care notes, when R1 returned to the facility on January 6, 2022, facility staff requested an updated physician’s report from R1’ doctor and planned to update R1’s service plan. R1’s care notes document that on February 18, 2022, a care plan meeting was held with R1’s family, it was explained to R1’s family that R1’s service plan had not yet been updated because the facility was still waiting on an updated physician’s report from R1’s doctor, R1’s family was advised that staff are all aware of R1’s new care needs and the required care was being provided, and R1’s family advised the facility that R1 would be moving out. While the facility noted R1’s new care level and claimed to provide the newly required services, the facility did not need to wait for the new physician’s report in order to finalize the changes already discussed with R1’s family. In this case, R1 returned to the facility on January 6, 2022 and did not have a finalized updated service plan by the time they moved out on February 19, 2022.
During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations mentioned above. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Civil penalties for repeat violations are being assessed. See LIC421FC. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative. |