1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It also states that the resident will continue to be responsible for the monthly fee until the thirty day period has expired. On page six of the admission agreement, it also states that the resident is entitled to a portion of their community fee, based on the length of their stay at the facility. The Department observed R1's admission agreement to be signed by both R1's Responsible Party, Witness #1 (W1), and a facility representative, indicating that both parties agreed to the terms of the contract. The Department reviewed emails between Witness #1 (W1), and the Executive Director at the time, Staff #1 (S1). The Department observed that W1 provided S1 with a written notice on April 7, 2024, that they intended to move R1 out of the facility. Therefore, R1 would continue to be responsible for the monthly fee until May 7, 2024, when the thirty day period expired. The Department reviewed R1's billing statements and observed the facility charged R1 his monthly fees until May 7, 2024, in accordance to the admission agreement. The Department also observed that the facility refunded R1 a portion of his community fee, in accordance to their admission agreement. Based on the records reviewed, the facility satisfied their obligations under the admission agreement and provided the necessary refunds to R1. The Department observed that R1 was not entitled to any additional refunds and were charged appropriately during their stay at the facility.
Based on the evidence gathered during this investigation, the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Sabina Nayberg and a copy of the report was provided at time of visit. |