1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Statements from 1 witness, 1 resident, AD, and 2 staff conflict about how long the facility was aware of the leak before calling Edison Fire Protection. AD followed the instructions from Edison Fire Protection and had the ceiling torn down immediately so the inspection could take place. Prior to 07/22/22, Edison Fire Protection came out to inspect the fire system but referred the job to Edison Environmental Protection because it was outside of their scope of work. AD stated that prior to 08/10/22, Edison Environmental Protection came out and inspected the fire sprinkler system and told AD they could fix the problem and that once the problem had been fixed, the ceiling can be closed back up and repaired. LPA reviewed an Edison Environmental Protection letter dated 08/10/22 that corroborates AD’s statements about the fire sprinkler system, states that Edison Environmental Protection has identified the problem and proposed a solution, and states that Edison Environmental Protection is recommending that the ceiling remain open until all repairs are completed, after which point the ceiling can be closed up and repaired. However, per interviews with AD and 1 witness, Edison Environmental Protection was ready to begin the work immediately after 08/10/22 but the facility did not provide the down payment on the project until 09/29/22, with the work finally starting on 10/04/22. Per AD, there was never any risk of the ceiling collapsing or of physical injury to the residents in the room and Edison Environmental Protection has confirmed this to AD. LPA inspected the ceiling twice and observed that while some insulation is pulled out, the wood and pipes are in their regular locations and the ceiling appears structurally sound. However, due to the facility’s delay in providing the down payment, the ceiling was in disrepair for almost 2 months before the repairs were started, with the residents having to live with an open ceiling and exposed insulation for that period.
During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation mentioned above. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative. |