1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation, LPA Haley discovered C1 has a history of elevating issues to his Responsible Party (RP) or the Regional Center before going to the Licensee/Administrator and/or facility staff to give them and opportunity to resolve the issue. It was discovered that C1 was told that he needs to start notifying the facility staff before elevating the matter, by more than one person. Further, C1 was in a meeting with another client in the facility who was causing a lot of disturbance in the facility and bullying other clients in the facility. During that meeting C2 was informed if his behavior doesn’t change, he would be given a 30-day notice. It’s believed that C1 may have got confused and scared and thought that he was getting a 30-day notice as well because he was in the same meeting. No evidence to support this allegation was provided, and there were no witnesses to confirm this allegation to be true.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, review of all documents obtained, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided AD Madrigal. |