1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation, Food service does not meet the needs of the residents, it is alleged that the residents are fed the same thing every day for breakfast, oatmeal with banana, and are left to make their own meals for lunch and dinner. Based on one meal service at 11am, LPA observed residents were served steak, mash potato with gravy, steamed broccoli, and a side of peaches. Based on the interviews, two of three residents indicated not having concerns with food. Although both residents indicated that there not being a variety of meals, they were satisfied with all meals and found it to be sufficient in meal choices, serving size, quality, and nutrition. Both residents indicated that meals were prepped by the staff. One remaining resident could not recall details. Two of two staff did not corroborate the allegation indicating that meals are prepared by staff and breakfast is alternated between oatmeal, sandwich, or eggs with a side of fruit, water, and juice.
Regarding the allegation, Staff are unable to meet the needs of the residents due to language barrier, it is alleged that S1 does not speak English interfering with the care which they are not able to provide to the residents. Based on LPA's observation, residents were observed relaxing. Based on the interviews, three of three residents and two of two staff denied the allegation. The three residents expressed satisfaction with their care. Although, S1 acknowledged not being proficient in English, S1 indicated that they are able to communicate daily tasks and needs of residents via simple, plain English and through gestures.
Regarding the allegation, Staff yelled at resident, it is alleged that S1 yelled at a former resident. Based on the review of the face sheets, only one of the three residents resided at the facility at the time. Three of three residents denied S1 or any other staff yelling at them or other residents. Two of two staff did not corroborate with the allegation.
Therefore, based on the observations made, interviews which were conducted, and the records that were reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the following allegations: Licensee smoked marijuana inside the facility, Food service does not meet the needs of the residents, Staff are unable to meet the needs of the residents due to language barrier, and Staff yelled at resident are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eduardo Capistrano, and a copy of this report was provided via email at the end of the visit. |