1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | One out of the two staff added Client 1 (C1)’s family member was provided $500 dollars cash on December 1, 2025 from the facility for use during an outing as C1’s family member is part of C1’s conservatorship. No records on how the cash was spent are available. LPA interviews with one out of three clients stated they receive money when they ask for it. The remaining two clients could not be qualified for interviews.
Record review revealed the facility has one trust account set up for the clients’ funds. LPA reviewed ledgers for four out of four clients for November 28, 2025 as it matched the date of the trust bank statement provided. The amount stated in the bank statement on this day did not match the total amounts of the ledgers. LPA reviewed a client receipt of cash written to and signed by C1’s conservator issued on December 1, 2025. C1’s conservatorship is a limited conservatorship filed on October 26, 2006 stating C1’s family member conservatorship powers include access to confidential records and papers of the limited conservatee, the power of the limited conservatee to contract, the power of the limited conservatee to give or withhold medical consent, and decisions concerning the education of the limited conservatee. There is no mention of the power over financial accounts.
Based on interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was left with the facility representative along with appeal rights. |