1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed AD who stated that R1 is no longer a resident of the facility, could not walk due to having both of their feet amputated, had dementia, resided in the memory care unit, and was on hospice. LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report dated May 31, 2024, which indicates R1 has dementia and is non-ambulatory. LPA inspected the memory care unit where R1 resided, conducted health and safety checks on the residents, and observed no health and safety issues. LPA inspected R1’s former room and observed no health and safety issues. Per AD, R1 had a fall on March 10, 2024, and then eight falls between September 1, 2024, and October 13, 2024, none of which resulted in fractures but did result in stitches and bandages, and were caused by R1 trying to get up and walk forgetting that they could not walk without a walker. LPA reviewed Facility Incident Reports for R1 dated September 1, 2024, to October 13, 2024, which document the eight falls that R1 suffered during this period. AD and HWD stated in interviews that after the March 10, 2024 fall, the facility began conducting regular safety checks on R1 and lowered R1’s bed to the lowest position and R1 did not have any falls for a few months afterwards. Per AD and HWD, after the series of eight falls began on September 1, 2024, the facility took the following steps to address R1’s falls: staff had multiple conversations with R1’s family to address R1’s falls; a fall pad was paced in front of R1’s bed; R1 was encouraged to spend time in the activity room where they would be under closer observation and would not try to get up; a halo was requested from hospice for R1’s bed, which was refused by hospice; hospice suggested a full bed rail, but the facility’s policy is for no restraints to keep residents in bed; R1’s medications were adjusted multiple times to address their agitation which contributed to their falls; one-on-one supervision was suggested to R1’s family, which was refused; volunteers and continuous care were requested from hospice, which were refused. LPA reviewed R1’s Personal Service Plan dated October 13, 2024, which, per AD, documents the facility’s fall prevention plan, and noted that the fall prevention plan does not include one-on-one supervision and that approximately twenty-two falls for R1 were documented in 2024. Per AD, only nine of these falls required a visit to the hospital. When asked why the facility did not provide one-on-one supervision to address R1’s eight falls in a little over a month, AD stated that R1’s family refused. LPA interviewed one witness who stated that the facility did not offer or suggest one-on-one supervision to R1’s family, the facility waited too long to administer R1’s psychiatric as-needed medications, resulting in R1 getting too agitated and refusing the medications, which contributed to R1’s falls, and that R1’s multiple falls resulted in lacerations, pain, and sometimes stitches. The measures taken by the facility to address R1’s falls clearly did not work and therefore the facility did not provide care and supervision to meet R1’s needs. The information obtained corroborated the allegation. |