1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 1 of the interviews specified that prior management failed to charge R1 for tray services, and now that there is new management at the facility, the management is adhering to the protocol regarding the rate increases. RP also stated that R1 was notified about these increases due to the tray services, to which R1 was provided explanations and encouragement to not utilize tray services if R1 did not want to continue paying. LPA reviewed records and it was observed that prior management did not charge R1 for tray services and obtained verification from R1 that R1 had been utilizing tray services "all the time".
It was alleged that staff incorrectly billed resident for medications. LPA conducted an interview with RP and S1 and it was revealed that R1 is being charged for a prescribed medication, however RP believes that R1 does not need it, therefore it should not be billed. The interview with S1 stated that the facility contacted R1's doctor to inquire about if R1's medication should be discontinued, to which the doctor declined and stated that the medication for R1 would be continued as needed. LPA reviewed records and it was observed that the medication chart for R1 is up to date and reflect the medications that are prescribed by the doctor.
It was alleged that staff are not following resident's medication doctor's orders. An interview with S1 stated that RP believes what medications R1 should not have, however, S1 verified that the facility manages R1's medications. The medication RP believes should be discontinued is a pro re nata "PRN" of which S1 stated that the PRN medication is only given to R1 as needed per physician report. An interview was conducted with RP, who was unable to provide further information regarding this allegation. RP then requested LPA to "disregard" the allegations/complaint due to obtaining information and explanations from the facility.
Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with ED Howell. A copy of this report was explained and provided. |