1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews concluded that R1’s air loss mattress was unavailable as required for R1. During an interview conducted on October 01, 2020, Licensee Representative Shazad Khan stated they asked the Executive Director about the bed issue and was told she did not know anything about it and found no documentation of the issue in the facility log or care notes. Five (5) of Five (5) Interviewees indicated that the required air loss mattress was removed from R1’s room for an unknown amount of time. R1 had been relocated to a different room twice due to remodeling work being done in the facility. Interviewees reported R1 went without using the air mattress. Although staff tried to mitigate R1’s pressure injury by turning the resident on their side and repositioning the resident. Interviews conducted concluded that the resident would resume laying flat on their back and that the required air loss mattress was not being provided to R1.
Licensee Representative Shazad Khan had the facility doctor assess all the residents in the facility due to the residents having rashes. The doctor decided to treat all residents for scabies out of precaution, despite the fact that none of the residents were ever medically tested or confirmed for scabies. One (1) of six (6) Interviewees stated R1, as well as the rest of the residents, had a rash but were never tested and verified as scabies. All residents were treated with permethrin cream, which is used to treat scabies.
There was not a request for an exception received by the Department in order to retain a resident with a prohibited health condition of unstageable pressure injuries nor was R1 observed to be receiving hospice care services. Licensee Shazad Khan did not report that he notified the home health nurse of the condition’s prohibited status.
Based on the preponderance of evidence gathered through multiple interviews and documents obtained; the allegations “Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care,” “Facility staff did not keep facility free of scabies,” “Resident was left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time,” and “Facility staff did not ensure that resident’s medical equipment was in working order,” has been met. Therefore, the allegations listed above are deemed to be SUBSTANTIATED.
The facility is being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Shazad Khan on 6/28/2021 and on 6/29/2021 with Licensee Jack Carlino. A copy of this report, along with 9099-D, Appeal Rights, and the LIC 811, identifying confidential names were provided to Licensee Representative Shazad Khan and Jack Carlino. The report, along with all other documents listed above were sent via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving of the report. Licensee Khan agrees to review the report and to send the signed report back to the LPA Quiroz via email.
***THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT*** |