1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Special Incident Report states that the facility AD mentioned to C1s physician, that whatever the plans for C1 are, they can not take C1 back to the facility due to C1 needing a higher level of care that specializes with their health condition. Upon interviews with staff 1 (S1) it was revealed that C1 was taken to the hospital and was then transferred to a skilled nursing facility but, did not return to the facility. S1 informed LPA that they did not give an eviction notice due to C1 being admitted to the hospital and transferred to a skilled nursing facility. S1 denied receiving calls from hospital staff, but informed LPA that C1 needed to stay at the hospital for treatment due to their diagnosis.
LPA was unable to contact C1s responsible party.
Based on interviews and record review gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with AD Antoinette Nichols and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D and appeal rights were left at the facility.
|