1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of the interviews with staff, S1 reported that the clients’ bedrooms are in good repair and stated that he does the minor repairs in a timely manner. Per S2 the bedrooms are not in disrepair. S3 stated that some clients destroy their bedrooms by kicking the door or punching the walls. S3 reported that if the facility is in disrepair that management will repair it.
Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure facility is free of wall leaks, the following was revealed: During the initial visit on July 12, 2024, and subsequent visits on May 28, 2025, and June 26, 2025, LPA tour the facility and did not observe wall leaks. During the course of the interviews with clients, C1 reported that she has not seen leaks on the walls. Per C2 he has not seen wall leaks since living here. C3 stated that she has never seen wall leaks. During the course of the interviews with staff, S1 reported that if there is a leak that it will get fix as soon as possible. Per S2 she has not seen water leaks. S3 stated that she has not seen major leaks.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of documents obtained, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, these allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
For today’s visit, there were no citations issued per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.
LPA conducted an exit interview with AD Arastoo, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
|