1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per SART examination report, there were no DNA results from this evidence kit. The facility video footage dated August 1, 2025, did not capture Administrative Assistant either entering or exiting C1’s bedroom. During the interviews with clients, four of five clients interviewed denied the allegation. During the interviews with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that staff have not sexually assaulted a client. Per S2, staff have not sexually assaulted the clients. During the interviews the AD reported that she checked the hallway cameras and did not see anyone enter C1's bedroom. Per AD Assistant, he never had an encounter with C1 other than when saying hi.
Regarding the allegation that staff physically assaulted clients, the following was revealed: During the interviews with clients, four of five clients interviewed denied the allegation. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Evidence Receipt/Report dated September 17, 2025. Per Evidence Receipt/Report, AD presented a USB drive containing video surveillance footage with the camera facing C1’s bedroom. Per Evidence Receipt/Report, after reviewing the footage, the alleged perpetrator was not seeing entering or exiting C1’s bedroom. During the interviews with staff, S1 reported that staff have not physically assaulted a client. Per S2, C1 was a tough woman for staff to physically assaulted her. During the interviews AD Assistant reported that he did not physically assaulted C1.
Regarding the allegation that staff threatened clients, the following was revealed: During interviews with clients, four of five clients interviewed denied the allegation. During the interviews with staff, S1 reported that staff have not threatened a client. Per S2, staff have not threatened the clients. During the interviews the AD Assistant reported that he did not threaten C1.
Regarding the allegation that staff are mismanaging client’s medication, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June through July 2025 for C1. Per MAR, C1 was given her medications as prescribed. During the interviews with clients, four of five clients interviewed denied the allegation and/or stated that they get their medications as prescribed. During the interviews with staff, S1 reported that the medications are given to the clients as prescribed. Per S2, the medications are given as prescribed, and it is reported that some clients refuse to take their medications. During the interviews AD stated that C1 was given her medications as prescribed. Per AD Assistant, staff did not mismanaged C1’s medications.
CONTINUED LIC9099-C...
|