1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff inappropriately touched resident. It is alleged that on 6/12/2022 at approximately 1315 hours, after lunch, staff (S1) put it's arms around resident (R1) from behind, and proceeded to touch resident (R1's) breasts and genitalia while the resident was in the kitchen/dining area. Department of Social Services Investigations Branch (IB) Investigator P. Miles conducted the investigation. Based on interviews conducted, the findings indicate that staff (S1) sexually abused the developmentally disabled resident by touching R1's genitalia, and grabbing of upper body area. The perpetrator staff stated that the resident felt good when they were touched. The victim (R1) asked staff (S1) to stop, but staff (S1) refused. The alleged incident lasted approximately five (5) minutes, and was interrupted by a phone call received by the staff. There were no witnesses. Other residents were in the living room watching television when the incident occurred.
On 6/12/2022, LA County Sheriff's Department personnel conducted a health and welfare check. They offered to take the resident for a medical exam, but the resident refused. The following day, Assistant Administrator Jacqueline Mikin transported R1 to the hospital for a Forensic Medical Report: Acute Adult/Adolescent Sexual Assault Examination. Evidence was collected. On 6/15/2022, LPA conducted a health and safety check and observed staff (S1's) personal belongings in the staff room. Criminal record clearance was checked and staff (S1) was not associated to the facility. Staff (S1) was hired on 5/6/2022.
During the interview, staff (S1) claimed numerous times that they did not touch the resident. However, staff (S1) finally admitted to touching the resident inappropriately, and stated it was "an accident and mistake". On 1/12/2024, LPA called other licensed facilities where staff (S1) is associated. Staff (S1) answered the phone at an Orange County licensed facility owned by the same licensee. Staff (S1) confirmed their identity. Therefore, staff (S1) is still employed at Licensee's other home. There is an indication that the licensee was not being forthcoming about whether staff (S1) continues to work in a licensed facility since they did not disclose that they were employed at an associated facility. Sufficient evidence exists to immediately exclude staff member, and corroborate the allegation.
An immediate civil penalty of $500.00 is hereby assessed (Refer to LIC 421B).
Administrator was informed that an enhanced civil penalty might be assessed based on H & S Code.
Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per Title 22, deficiencies are cited.
This report was reviewed telephonically with Assistant Administrator Jacqueline Mikin. A copy of the report, appeal rights, and civil penalty assessed was provided to staff Edwin Teoco. |